18/09/2024
ICC National Committees were asked to provide feedback on their preferred option from the below choices:
a) maintain the current version of ISBP 821, or,
b) initiate a limited revision of the identified issues, or,
c) move forward with a full, formal revision process.
The overwhelming majority response from National Committees has been to proceed with a limited revision of ISBP 821, based upon the identified issues.
Accordingly, the Technical Advisory Briefing Team have re-compiled the recommendations providing details of the recommended change(s) and the underlying rationale.
These cover a number of issues, headlined below:
- Sanctions
- Excessive detail
- Previously accepted discrepancies
- In context with
- Ambiguity
- All documents
- Without delay
- Non-documentary conditions
- Direct presentation
- Detailed
- Manually
- Use of drafts
- Requirement for draft
- Endorsement of draft
- Title of invoice
- Free of charge
- Incoterms
- Update paragraph D7
- Main transport leg by air
- Port of discharge
- Applicability of paragraph D1 (c)
- Cities on Transport Documents
- Applicability of paragraph D17
- Original NNSWB
- Road, Rail or Inland Waterway update to three sections
- Basic requirement and fulfilling functionof Certificate of Origin
- Content of a Packing List
- Encourage and increase the usage of Multimodal Transport Documents
- On Board notations
- Numbering of a transport document
- Endorsement
- Extend or Pay
- Additional implications
- Covering letter statements
- Document mailing
- Digital issues not to be included in the revision
- No current market practice exists for eUCP processes, therefore digital should not be included in ISBP at this stage
We will provide more details as the project moves forward.
www.tradefinance.training
